Loading ...
Loading ...
Loading ...
For Your Safety 163
TheFCCalsoregulatesthebasestationsthatthewirelessphonenetworksrely
upon. While these base stations operate at higher power than do the wireless
phones themselves, the RF exposures that people get from these base stations are
typically thousands of times lower than those they can get from wireless phones.
Base stations are thus not the subject of the safety questions discussed in this
document.
3. What kinds of phones are the subject of this update?
The term “wireless phone” refers here to handheld wireless phones with built-in
antennas,oftencalled“cell”,“mobile,or“PCS”phones.Thesetypesofwireless
phones can expose the user to measurable Radio Frequency (RF) energy because
of the short distance between the phone and the user’s head.
TheseRFexposuresarelimitedbyFCCsafetyguidelinesthatweredevelopedwith
the advice of the FDA and other federal health and safety agencies. When the
phone is located at greater distances from the user, the exposure to RF is drastically
lower because a person’s RF exposure decreases rapidly with increasing distance
from the source. The so-called “cordless phones,” which have a base unit connected
to the telephone wiring in a house, typically operate at far lower power levels, and
thusproduceRFexposuresfarbelowtheFCCsafetylimits.
4. What are the results of the research done already?
The research done thus far has produced conflicting results, and many studies have
suffered from flaws in their research methods. Animal experiments investigating
the effects of Radio Frequency (RF) energy exposures characteristic of wireless
phones have yielded conflicting results that often cannot be repeated in other
laboratories. A few animal studies, however, have suggested that low levels of RF
could accelerate the development of cancer in laboratory animals. However, many
of the studies that showed increased tumor development used animals that had
been genetically engineered or treated with cancer-causing chemicals so as to
be pre-disposed to develop cancer in the absence of RF exposure. Other studies
exposedtheanimalstoRFforupto22hoursperday.Theseconditionsarenot
similar to the conditions under which people use wireless phones, so we do not
know with certainty what the results of such studies mean for human health. Three
largeepidemiologystudieshavebeenpublishedsinceDecember2000.Between
them, the studies investigated any possible association between the use of wireless
phones and primary brain cancer, glioma, meningioma, or acoustic neuroma, tumors
of the brain or salivary gland, leukemia, or other cancers. None of the studies
demonstrated the existence of any harmful health effects from wireless phone RF
exposures. However, none of the studies can answer questions about long-term
Loading ...
Loading ...
Loading ...